Families' Distress Regarding Coastal Erosion Endangering Coastal Norfolk Burial Sites
Families whose relatives laid to rest in graves at risk from shoreline retreat state that indecision over how to address the issue is causing them avoidable anguish about the eternal homes of their loved ones.
An Impending Danger to Ancient Graveyards
Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being engulfed by the sea in the next few generations.
A recent report on the issue details a series of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure locations. Authorities maintain it is for local people to determine how to proceed.
“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. They wanted this to be their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”
Estimates indicate at least part of one churchyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.
Troubled by the Past
A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the water, along with its church and graveyard.
“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that the deceased will just get washed out to sea. They won’t. People will take bones as souvenirs and go grave robbing looking for treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”
“I’m worried that the same thing that happened at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I’d be disgusted by that.”
A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril
Further up the coast lies the grave of a ex-soldier killed while working abroad. His parent expressed she lost sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.
“It truly disturb me to consider this won’t be his lasting home,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”
She believes, new burials should stop but says it is premature to exhume current plots. “My preference for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been reached.”
Searching for Answers and Certainty
An absence of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and worried.
Some want more coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to allow funerals to proceed for now. Different voices argue the time for moving graves is drawing near.
“It is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The official study was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”
A local official confirmed the graveyards were under the care of the church authorities. “In the end it is down to them to decide the path to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with communities.”
He added there was ample time to weigh all the options. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”
“Currently, there exists no common view on what should happen yet. It requires good local conversations to find the right solutions for each village.”
The possibility of the loss of the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “immense sadness for the area,” but faith leaders also spoke of a belief in resurrection, providing a theological perspective on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.